UPSC CSE Mains 2013 · GS3
Bringing out the circumstances in 2005 which forced amendment to the section 3(d) in Indian Patent Law, 1970, discuss how it has been utilized by the Supreme Court in its judgement in rejecting Novratis’ patent application for ‘Glivec’. Discuss briefly the pros and cons of the decision.
Theme
T150 Intellectual property rights: patents, 3(d), TKDL, life forms
What UPSC asks in this theme
UPSC asks the world IPR scenario for life forms and India's low commercialisation, TKDL open access, IPR types, and Section 3(d) and the Novartis case.
What to cover
- Patents, copyrights, trade secrets
- TRIPS and flexibilities
- Section 3(d) and Glivec judgment
- TKDL
- Commercialisation gap
Writing the answer
- Case-based argument
These notes are for the whole theme, built from all 4 of its PYQs. UPSC does not publish model answers.
More PYQs from this theme
- GS3202410 marks
- GS32015
- GS32014
All 25 GS3 2013 questions · Technology, Economy, Environment, Security & Disaster Management · Report a typo