UPSC CSE Mains 2014 · GS2
The setting up of a Rail Tariff Authority to regulate fares will subject the cash strapped Indian Railways to demand subsidy for obligation to operate non-profitable routes and services. Taking into account the experience in the power sector, discuss if the proposed reform is expected to benefit the consumers, the Indian Railways or the private container operators.
Theme
T100 Regulatory & quasi-judicial bodies: CCI, SEBI–IRDA, tariff authorities
What UPSC asks in this theme
UPSC asks CCI's role against MNC abuse of dominance, merging SEBI and IRDA, a rail tariff authority, why regulators must stay independent, and quasi-judicial bodies.
What to cover
- Regulatory independence: appointment, tenure, funding
- CCI cases (Google, etc.)
- Financial regulator convergence (FSLRC)
- Quasi-judicial bodies: features, examples
Writing the answer
- Use recent cases
These notes are for the whole theme, built from all 5 of its PYQs. UPSC does not publish model answers.
More PYQs from this theme
- GS2202310 marks
- GS22016
What is quasi judicial body? Explain with the help of concrete examples.
- GS22015
- GS22013
All 20 GS2 2014 questions · Governance, Constitution, Polity, Social Justice & International Relations · Report a typo