Home / GS2 / 2019 / Question UPSC CSE Mains 2019 · GS2
Do you think that Constitution of India does not accept principle of strict separation of powers rather it is based on the principle of ‘checks and balance’? Explain. Start 9-min timer Share on WhatsApp Copy
Theme
What UPSC asks in this theme Questions ask about PIL's growth, judicial activism, judicial legislation and separation of powers, and specific verdicts like passive euthanasia.
What to cover Separation of powers vs checks and balances PIL origins and misuse Judicial legislation examples: Vishaka, euthanasia (Aruna Shanbaug, Common Cause) Writing the answer Balance activism vs overreach These notes are for the whole theme, built from all 5 of its PYQs. UPSC does not publish model answers.
More PYQs from this theme GS2 2026 15 marks
What is meant by judicial legislation? In this context, discuss the verdicts of the apex court allowing “passive euthanasia” and a “living will”
GS2 2024 15 marks
Explain the reasons for the growth of public interest litigation in India. As a result of it, has the Indian Supreme Court emerged as the world's most powerful judiciary?
GS2 2020
Judicial Legislation is antithetical to the doctrine of separation of powers as envisaged in the Indian Constitution. In this context justify the filing of large number of public interest petitions praying for issuing guidelines to executive authorities.
GS2 2014
Starting from inventing the ‘basic structure’ doctrine, the judiciary has played a highly proactive role in ensuring that India develops into a thriving democracy. In light of the statement, evaluate the role played by judicial activism in achieving the ideals of democracy.
‹ Previous · GS2 2019 “The reservation of seats for women in the institutions of local self-government has had… Next › · GS2 2019 The Central Administrative Tribunal which was established for redressal of grievances and… All 10 GS2 2019 questions · Governance, Constitution, Polity, Social Justice & International Relations · Report a typo