UPSC CSE Mains 2013 · GS2
Many State Governments further bifurcate geographical administrative areas like Districts and Talukas for better governance. In light of the above, can it also be justified that more number of smaller States would bring in effective governance at State level? Discuss.
Theme
T19 Integration & reorganisation of states: princely states, linguistic states, new & smaller states
What UPSC asks in this theme
A strong cross-paper theme. GS1 asks about princely state integration and linguistic reorganisation; GS2 asks whether smaller states mean better governance. Recent questions ask whether reorganisation came from popular pressure from below.
What to cover
- Integration of princely states: Patel, V.P. Menon, Junagadh, Hyderabad, Kashmir
- Linguistic reorganisation: Potti Sriramulu, SRC 1953–56, effect on unity
- New states: Uttarakhand, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Telangana — economic results
- Arguments for and against smaller states
- Continuous reorganisation since the 19th century
Writing the answer
- Use both history and present governance evidence
- End with a balanced view on unity and administrative efficiency
These notes are for the whole theme, built from all 6 of its PYQs. UPSC does not publish model answers.
This question also needs
T87 Centre–State relations: cooperative, competitive & confrontational federalismT92 Local self-government: 73rd/74th Amendments, functions, funds & functionaries
On the map
More PYQs from this theme
- GS1202615 marks
Linguistic reorganization of Indian States was driven by popular pressure from below. Comment
- GS1202215 marks
- GS12021
- GS12018
- GS12016
Has the formation of linguistic states strengthened the cause of Indian unity?
All 25 GS2 2013 questions · Governance, Constitution, Polity, Social Justice & International Relations · Report a typo